常垚;程林;黄仁乐;李蕴;

• 1:清华大学电机工程及应用电子技术系
• 2:国家电网北京市电力公司

摘要(Abstract)：

电力市场环境下配电网投资必须由接入其中的各方承担,公平合理的费用分摊方案是配电网健康有序发展的重要内容之一。提出一种基于夏普利值与最优潮流结合的费用分摊方法。首先借助最优潮流,确定在灵活可控配网中,由于分布式电源、负荷接入引起的最小扩建费用;再利用夏普利值对各方影响进行加权平均,进而确定费用分摊方案。以北京市延庆地区为蓝本设计算例进行验证,对一般负荷、电动汽车、光伏接入后各方所应承担的费用进行了分析。算例表明,所提方法能反映接入要素的类型、接入位置、容量、可控性等多个因素的影响。当接入方具有抑制主变过负载、电压越限、可灵活调节等属性时,可降低其接入费用,从而证明了该方法能够有效构成经济激励。

关键词(KeyWords)： 固定成本;夏普利值;费用分摊;最优潮流

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家863高技术基金项目(2015AA050102);; 国家自然科学基金项目(51177078);; 国家电网公司科技项目(52020116000D)~~

作者(Author): 常垚;程林;黄仁乐;李蕴;

Email:

DOI: 10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2016.11.007

参考文献(References)：

• [1]邢海军,程浩忠,张沈习,等.主动配电网规划研究综述[J].电网技术,2015,39(10):2705-2711.Xing Haijun,Cheng Haozhong,Zhang Shenxi,et al.Review of active distribution network planning[J].Power System Technology,2015,39(10):2705-2711(in Chinese).
• [2]段登伟,刘俊勇,牛怀平,等.基于标尺竞争模式的配电侧电力市场综述[J].电网技术,2015,29(8):8-13.Duan Dengwei,Liu Junyong,Niu huaiping,et al.Reseach on distribution electricity market based on yardstick competition mode[J].Power System Technology,2005.29(8):8-13(in Chinese).
• [3]万国成,任震,张勇军.配电网中容量电费定价方法[J].电力系统自动化,2002,26(18):15-20.Wan Guocheng,Ren Zhen,Zhang Yongjun.Price setting of capacity charge in distribution system[J].Automation of Electric Power Systems,2002,26(18):15-20(in Chinese).
• [4]苏娟,杜松怀,叶华.零售竞争市场配电网固定成本分摊方法研究[C]//中国高等学校电力系统及其自动化专业学术年会.长沙:长沙理工大学,2009:1-5.
• [5]黄庆云.含分布式发电的配电网固定费用分摊研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2008.
• [6]孙轶环.含分布式小水电的配电网固定成本分摊模型研究[D].北京:华北电力大学,2015.
• [7]Li F,Padhy N P,Wang J,et al.Cost-benefit reflective distribution charging methodology[J].IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2008,23(1):58-64.
• [8]Soares T,Faria P,Vale Z,et al.Definition of distribution network tariffs considering distribution generation and demand response[C]//IEEE/PES Transmission&Distribution Conference.Chicago,USA:IEEE,2014:1-5.
• [9]甘德强,杨莉,冯冬涵.电力经济与电力市场[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2010:123-126.
• [10]Shapley L S.A value for n-person games[Z].Contributions to the theory of games:Princeton University Press,1953,2:307-317.
• [11]Junqueira M,Da Costa L C,Barroso L A,et al.An Aumann-Shapley approach to allocate transmission service cost among network users in electricity markets[J].IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2007,22(4):1532-1546.
• [12]Molina Y P,Saavedra O R,Amaris H.Transmission network cost allocation based on circuit theory and the Aumann-Shapley method[J].IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2013,28(4):4568-4577.
• [13]Molina Y P,Prada R B,Saavedra O R.Complex losses allocation to generators and loads based on circuit theory and Aumann-Shapley Method[J].IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2010,25(4):1928-1936.
• [14]Tan X,Lie T T.Application of the Shapley Value on transmission cost allocation in the competitive power market environment[J].IEE Proceedings-Generation,Transmission and Distribution,2002,149(1):15-20.
• [15]Voropai N I,Ivanova E Y.Shapley Game for expansion planning of generating companies at many non-coincident criteria[J].IEEE Transactions on Power Systems,2006,21(4):1630-1637.
• [16]常垚,程林,李洪涛,等.基于半正定松弛最优潮流的主动配电网多源协调优化控制[J].电网技术,2016,40(8):2416-2422.Chang Yao,Cheng Lin,Li Hongtao,et al.Distribution system optimal power flow with various controllable sources based on positive semidefinite relaxation[J].Power System Technology.2016,40(8):2416-2422(in Chinese).
• [17]Cheng Lin,Chang Yao,Wu Qiang,et al.Evaluating charging service reliability for plug-in EVs from the distribution network aspect[J].IEEE Transaction on Sustainable Energy,2014,5(4):1287-1296.